Education by voucher: private choice and the public interest
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback46 pages||$23.00||$18.40 20% Web Discount|
The last decade of public debate about public education has revolved around concerns that educational quality is declining. The public schools, many think, have become ineffective and inefficient deliverers of educational services. Many schemes have been proposed to overcome the problems of the public schools. In this paper, the authors examine whether an alternative scheme--vouchers--can solve the effectiveness and efficiency problems of the educational system through the mechanism of market accountability. First, the authors examine how public schooling has evolved to meet societal goals and how it has responded to competing public concerns. Then they turn their attention to the proposals and responses of voucher advocates, evaluating them in the light of the forces that have shaped public education in this country.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.