Cover: Numerical modeling of the Tejo Estuary for currents and water quality predictions

Numerical modeling of the Tejo Estuary for currents and water quality predictions

Published 1982

by D. A. Rodrigues, M. Teles, Jan J. Leendertse

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback15 pages $20.00

An extensive environmental study of the Tejo estuary indicated that one of the major sources of pollution in part of this estuary are the sewer discharges of Lisbon, Portugal. To assess the impact of alternative plans for pollution abatement, a model is required which can predict the extent of pollution in the system resulting from different sources. The model simulates the movement of water in the estuary and also the movement of substances which are dissolved in the water. In addition, the breakdown of these substances can be simulated. This paper discusses the formulation of the model, the model adjustment, flow fields, tide-induced residual circulations, quasi-steady state coliform distribution, coliform distribution after rainstorms, and sub-models.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.