Demand forecasting and revenue requirements, with implications for consideration in British Columbia

Jan Paul Acton

ResearchPublished 1983

Canadian utilities have recently been subjected to regulatory review of electric rate structures. This paper was presented to the British Columbia Utilities Commission in a British Columbia Hydro rate case. It reviews 50 studies of electricity demand drawn from U.S., Canadian, and international papers and applied to one or more of residential, commercial, and industrial customers. It provides an assessment of likely ranges of short- and long-run price elasticities of demand by customer class, as well as a discussion of elements of electric rate structures and costs relevant to rate review and load forecasting. Among other things, the author argues that failing to take account of a price elasticity leads to overbuilding and therefore, higher electricity rates than would occur if price elasticities were considered in load forecasts.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
64 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1983
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 64
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Document Number: P-6872

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Acton, Jan Paul, Demand forecasting and revenue requirements, with implications for consideration in British Columbia, RAND Corporation, P-6872, 1983. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6872.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Acton, Jan Paul, Demand forecasting and revenue requirements, with implications for consideration in British Columbia. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1983. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6872.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.