Sitting on Bayonets?
The Soviet Defense Burden and Moscow's Economic Dilemma
Expert InsightsPublished 1983
The Soviet Defense Burden and Moscow's Economic Dilemma
Expert InsightsPublished 1983
This paper discusses three issues: the level of Soviet military expenditure and the size of the resulting burden on the economy; current Soviet resource allocation policy dilemmas and the role of the military-economic system in their generation and possible future resolution; and the implications of the interconnections between defense spending and overall resource allocation for future growth of the military budget. The paper concludes that on political as well as economic grounds the best bet on future development is that the Kremlin will continue to be reluctant to embark on an intensive arms race, requiring major acceleration of defense spending. However, economic difficulties would not prevent a vigorous Kremlin response to perceived intensification of the external threat to Soviet security.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.