U.S.-China relations since the onset of normalization: a relationship in search of a rationale

Richard H. Solomon

ResearchPublished 1984

This paper explores the evolution of the United States' China policy since the Nixon Administration's normalization breakthrough in 1971. It reviews the complex factors that have interacted to shape U.S. policy toward China: (1) the U.S.-Soviet competition; (2) the state of Sino-Soviet relations; (3) China's own foreign policy shifts; and (4) the play of U.S. and Chinese domestic politics. The author notes that the United States has yet to reach a policy consensus on the potential strategic and defense benefits of the relationship with China, or to consolidate a set of stable bilateral ties in the areas of trade and cultural exchanges. He concludes that each country's leaders and domestic politics, and the Soviet military threat, will continue to be major factors affecting the relationship between the two nations.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
19 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1984
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 19
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-7015

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Solomon, Richard H., U.S.-China relations since the onset of normalization: a relationship in search of a rationale, RAND Corporation, P-7015, 1984. As of September 14, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7015.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Solomon, Richard H., U.S.-China relations since the onset of normalization: a relationship in search of a rationale. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1984. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7015.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.