Cover: Summarizing RAND's Study of Adult Felony Probation

Summarizing RAND's Study of Adult Felony Probation

Published 1985

by Joan R. Petersilia


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback42 pages $20.00

This paper is the text of a briefing presented to the U.S. Department of Justice on the results of research performed at RAND and published in RAND/R-3186-NIJ, Granting Felons Probation: Public Risks and Alternatives. It studied adult probationers convicted of six index crimes in two large California counties, Los Angeles and Alameda; identified the factors associated with receiving a prison sentence vs. probation; and determined that in the two counties studied, the recidivism rate among probationers was high: 65 percent were rearrested during the 40-month follow-up period, and nearly a third of the 51 percent who were reconvicted were placed back on probation, even though they had been charged with serious crimes. A model was developed to identify "good probation prospects" and only 3 percent of the study population qualified. Given the growing prison population, limited prison space, and shrinking budgets, the author recommends instituting Intermediate Punishment Programs, such as New Jersey's Intensive Surveillance Program, which requires participants to maintain employment, name a community sponsor with whom they live, provide community service, attend counseling, and pay victim restitution and a fee to cover costs of their supervision.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.