Cover: The MISER criterion for imbalance in the analysis of covariance

The MISER criterion for imbalance in the analysis of covariance

Published 1985

by S. James Press

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback27 pages $20.00

This paper describes a new computer-intensive statistical technique for comparing unbalanced experimental designs that will be modeled by the univariate analysis of covariance. It proposes treating the imbalance in the design by Minimizing the Inflation of the Standard Error of a contrast (MISER). It provides results for both the standard Gauss-Markov model (constant error variance) and the model with heteroscedasticity. It also discusses the problem of attributing the increased variance caused by imbalance in a design to particular covariates. The effect of implementing the proposed MISER criterion is to generate a design that has great sensitivity to treatment effect differences. The MISER criterion is applied to the Department of Defense's Enlistment Bonus Test, involving offering cash incentives to induce high quality young men to enlist in the U.S. Army.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.