Cover: Evaluating Civil Claims

Evaluating Civil Claims

An Expert Systems Approach

Published 1985

by D. A. Waterman, Mark A. Peterson

Download

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback15 pages $20.00

This paper, a reprint of an article that originally appeared in Vol. 1 of the journal Expert Systems, describes the authors' current work in applying expert systems, a sophisticated form of computer modeling, to describe reasoning involved in settlement of civil liability claims. The authors studied how lawyers and adjusters evaluate civil claims in the product liability area, and developed a schema that organizes the facts and issues of a case. The schema, and a large set of rules they use to elaborate the schema, form the basis for an expert system that models legal decisionmaking. This system, called LDS, can help both researchers and litigators understand better how claim evaluation takes place since it provides a basis for generating and organizing hypotheses about litigators' methods for making settlements. The findings suggest that rule-based expert systems can be developed and used to understand decisions involved in civil litigation; this information can be translated into the if-then rules of a rule-based model, and that model can capture much of the richness and flexibility of legal reasoning.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.