Cover: Comments on the paper by John Menefee

Comments on the paper by John Menefee

by Joseph P. Newhouse

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback8 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

This paper raises several questions about the economics of the health of the elderly that must be identified in order to assess the adequacy of current data to answer them. The questions relate to methods of financing and organizing personal medical care services, utilization review and other direct controls on utilization, and the costs and benefits of alternative income support methods for the elderly. The author suggests that to answer the questions, the following are needed: (1) demonstrations with randomization; (2) public data such as those collected using the Health Interview Survey and the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; and (3) longitudinal data, such as those from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and the National Longitudinal Survey.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.