U.S. strategic force modernization and SDI: four key issues

Kevin N. Lewis

ResearchPublished 1986

This paper discusses transition aspects of both offensive and defensive forces should the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) continue. The author argues that it would be to the advantage of the United States to maintain its current offensive orientation in parallel with defensive developments until the strategic competition enters a fundamentally different (and final) defensive deployment phase. Four key issues discussed are: (1) potential interactions between major new homeland defenses and those parts of U.S. and NATO strategy that incorporate less than all-out nuclear employment options; (2) defense suppression and how the United States schedules its SDI deployment options; (3) certain budgetary and management considerations; and (4) reasons the United States should maintain powerful offensive forces until relatively late in the homeland defense deployment game.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
24 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1986
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 24
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-7214

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Lewis, Kevin N., U.S. strategic force modernization and SDI: four key issues, RAND Corporation, P-7214, 1986. As of September 15, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7214.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Lewis, Kevin N., U.S. strategic force modernization and SDI: four key issues. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1986. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7214.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.