The Implications of the Achille Lauro Hijacking for the Maritime Community

Jeffrey D. Simon

Expert InsightsPublished 1986

This paper was originally presented at the First International Workshop on Violence at Sea, San Jose, California, March 17-19, 1986. It reviews the hijacking of the Achille Lauro cruise ship on October 3, 1985, and in light of that event, considers (1) the prospects that terrorist attacks at sea will become a regular form of international terrorism, (2) the need for improved security measures at ports and aboard ships; and (3) the feasibility of designing and implementing an intelligence-sharing network for the maritime community.

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1986
  • Pages: 10
  • Document Number: P-7250

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Simon, Jeffrey D., The Implications of the Achille Lauro Hijacking for the Maritime Community. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1986. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7250.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.