Cover: Chlorinated solvents: the regulatory dilemma

Chlorinated solvents: the regulatory dilemma

by Kathleen A. Wolf

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback43 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

Industry is actively seeking alternatives to land disposal for halogenated solvents because of federal and state regulations restricting such disposal, because of potential future liability, and because many land disposal sites are closing. This paper characterizes the use, emissions, and waste generation in three of the primary industries where solvents are used. It considers the hazardous waste regulatory regime in the light of the life cycle of the solvents, of the regulations that affected them historically, and of the interactions among them. It examines the potential of reclamation for reducing use of virgin solvents and commensurately reducing the amount of waste generated. Case studies illustrate that users are increasingly finding this option attractive.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.