Correctional supervision of juvenile offenders: where do we go from here?
Expert InsightsPublished 1986
Current overcrowding of juvenile correctional facilities is temporary because the "baby boom" generation is aging; however, it offers a unique opportunity to experiment with supervisory alternatives to traditional secure confinement. Four forms of supervision to be considered are: (1) tracking and outreach--supervising activity of youths who are free in the community; (2) "9-to-5" programming--daytime supervision of youths who are returned to their own homes at night; (3) group homes, foster homes, and therapeutic communities--situations that require willing youth participation; and (4) secure residential programs, which range from traditional institutions to wilderness camps. Research is needed to determine which programs work best.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1986
- Pages: 36
- Document Number: P-7283
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.