Involving Consumers in Quality-of-Care Assessment

Do They Provide Valid Information?

Allyson Ross Davies, John E. Ware

Expert InsightsPublished 1987

Arguments that call into question the validity of information provided by consumers about quality of care have one thing in common: they presume that the information reflects something other than attributes of medical care. The authors' review of the various arguments leads them to conclude that consumers' ratings of interpersonal aspects of care provide useful and valid information on quality assessment and assurance programs. As for the technical process of care, reports and ratings from consumers will likely prove a valuable supplement to data from more traditional sources such as medical records.

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Davies, Allyson Ross and John E. Ware, Involving Consumers in Quality-of-Care Assessment: Do They Provide Valid Information? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1987. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7400.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.