Arguments that call into question the validity of information provided by consumers about quality of care have one thing in common: they presume that the information reflects something other than attributes of medical care. The authors' review of the various arguments leads them to conclude that consumers' ratings of interpersonal aspects of care provide useful and valid information on quality assessment and assurance programs. As for the technical process of care, reports and ratings from consumers will likely prove a valuable supplement to data from more traditional sources such as medical records.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.