Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback63 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

This paper was originally presented at a symposium on consent decrees, and appeared in the University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 1987. It explores the growing interest in consent degrees, by which lawsuits are resolved with the issuance of a judgment or decree, entered with the agreement of the parties. Arguments have been made that consent decrees are more economical than adjudicated decrees and achieve greater rates of compliance, but the empirical bases for such claims have not yet been established. The author examines the standard arguments for consent decrees and considers the role of judges in reviewing and entering them. She discusses the fact that judges must rely on the involved parties to present sufficient information for judging the adequacy of an agreement. The author concludes that, in many cases (e.g., class actions), judges must determine the adequacy of either the representation of the decree or of the settlement itself. However, as judicial involvement in crafting settlements grows, the ability of judges to make disinterested determinations of the adequacy of settlements diminishes.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.