Cover: Thinking-Red-in-Wargaming Workshop

Thinking-Red-in-Wargaming Workshop

Opportunities for Deception and Counterdeception in the Red Planning Process

Published 1989

by F. S. Feer

Download

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback15 pages $20.00

This paper, based on a workshop presentation sponsored by the National Defense University in June 1988, considers the Soviet military planning system's potential for and vulnerability to deception. The author defines the concept, suggesting that a sound view of deception must take into account the inherently deceptive aspect of operations; and outlines the Soviet planning process, cautioning that the Soviet military may understand the connection between deception and operations better than their Western counterparts. Finally, he presents three approaches to studying deception with the aid of models and simulations.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.