Neutrality for Eastern Europe?: an examination of possible Western role models
Expert InsightsPublished 1990
As the neutralization of Eastern Europe becomes increasingly likely, it is useful to examine the West European neutrals as potential role models for a new bilateral relationship with the Soviet Union. After considering five major Western neutral nations, it is apparent that some, particularly Austria and Finland, are better role models than others. Taking a cue from these two neutral states, the emerging East European neutrals should proceed in a way that actively addresses basic Soviet regional security interests. In addition, they should adopt a patient and evolutionary approach to neutrality. Otherwise, events could only lead to increased insecurity and instability in Europe, to the detriment of NATO, the Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1990
- Pages: 22
- Document Number: P-7622
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.