Cover: Preliminary thoughts concerning potential U.S. Army threats/roles

Preliminary thoughts concerning potential U.S. Army threats/roles

Published 1991

by Richard A. Greene, Kenneth A. Solomon, Jeffrey T. Miles

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback53 pages $23.00

By defining a broad spectrum of potential threats facing the Army of the future, this paper provides a base against which the potential advantages of alternative, advanced technologies applied to possible future U.S. Army roles can be examined. Focusing first upon threat locations, it discusses military force levels (and other characteristics) present in several areas of the world. The authors also discuss conflict size and organize potential threats in terms of their expected likelihood of occurrence and expected number of casualties, enabling them to define seven generic, potential threats: global nuclear war, global nonnuclear war, in-country wars, regional conflicts, insurgencies, reactions to terrorism, and civil action.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.