Cover: Can people compare stimulus information by a ratio operation?

Can people compare stimulus information by a ratio operation?

Published 1991

by Clairice T. Veit

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback23 pages $20.00

The debate about people's ability to estimate ratios or intervals has raged for decades. This paper describes research that produced the debate, experimental paradigms and research that resolved the debate, and the pitfalls of deriving scales from and basing conclusions on incorrect comparison operations. Historically, researchers believed that respondents followed task instructions when asked to judge ratios or intervals and that resulting numbers represented the scale of sensation for the stimulus dimension. However, nonlinear, nearly exponential relationships consistently resulted from ratio and interval judgments of the same stimuli. This empirical contradiction threatened to defeat the goal of developing single scales of sensation for stimulus dimensions. Recent research employed factorial designs that allow tests of hypothesized comparison models and distinction between subjective and response values. The evidence suggests that people's underlying operation is subtraction when performing both ratios and intervals of two stimuli. Research supports the conclusion that people can compare stimulus information by a ratio operation only when the stimulus information is in the form of differences or distances.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.