Germany in transition: national self-confidence and international reticence

Ronald D. Asmus

Expert InsightsPublished 1992

This paper contains the text of a statement before the Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle East of the Foreign Affairs Committee, U.S. House of Representatives, January 29, 1992. It presents data from a survey conducted in late 1991 as part of an effort to examine those factors that are likely to shape German strategic thinking in the years ahead. The survey focused on German public opinion on three issues: attitudes toward the United States and the U.S. military presence in Germany, attitudes toward the future evolution of the European Community (EC), and attitudes toward Germany's future world role and possible participation in crises outside the traditional NATO realm. The survey results indicate that (1) the United States enjoys considerable sympathy among the German public, but there is clearly an erosion of German public support for a sustained American military presence; (2) the German public supports the expansion of the EC to include prosperous neutral countries and the new democracies of East-Central Europe, but is reluctant to provide defense assistance to these countries and does not want a future European defense identity to exclude the United States; and (3) the German public supports assuming greater international responsibility, including German-supported humanitarian measures and economic sanctions, but is reluctant to support German participation in military actions.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Asmus, Ronald D., Germany in transition: national self-confidence and international reticence. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1992. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7767.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.