Gender, status, role, and adherence-- implications for social structure on patient adherence to medical recommendations
ResearchPublished 1992
ResearchPublished 1992
Socioeconomic and demographic factors have been largely viewed as "control variables" in patient adherence research. As a result, there is not a full understanding of socioeconomic and demographic influences on adherence. This study presents a conceptual model of patient adherence based on existing socioeconomic and demographic theories and then evaluates the model by secondary analysis of data collected in the Medical Outcomes Study, a study of the effects of structure and process on outcomes of care for patients with chronic disease (hypertension, heart disease, diabetes and/or depression). This paper focuses on the impact of social structure on patient behavior. It studies the effect of gender, role and status on patient's adherence to two types of physician recommendations: taking medications and exercising. It applies socioeconomic and demographic theories that model roles and statuses, and examines how roles and statuses produce different patient adherence patterns. It analyzes the effects of occupational and family responsibilities, role functional status, social class, and doctor-patient relationships on patient adherence. The authors found that household and occupational responsibilities are related to better patient adherence. Patients act as if adherence and performance of occupational and household responsibilities are complementary. They also found that those with severe illnesses are more likely to adhere to physicians' recommendations. Female patients are less likely to adhere to the recommendations. There was neither a significant social class effect nor a significant doctor's gender effect.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.