Cover: The Two Koreas in 1998: Dealing with Adversity

The Two Koreas in 1998: Dealing with Adversity

by Norman D. Levin

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback13 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

For Koreans on both sides of the divided peninsula, 1998 was a year of considerable adversity. Although the nature and extent of this adversity differed greatly between the two countries, the resulting challenges tested both severely. This analysis reviews the major developments in 1998 in both North and South Korea, as well as in North-South relations, and contrasts the respective responses. These sharply divergent responses tell much about the underlying fundamentals of the two systems. How they play out in the coming year will shape the short-term outlook for each country and help determine longer-term prospects for regional security. It also will help answer basic questions raised by developments in 1998 about key assumptions underlying Western policies.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.