An Analysis of the Apprehension Activities of the New York City Police Department

by Peter W. Greenwood


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback73 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

This report describes a set of criteria for evaluating apprehension efforts that are consistent with the overall objectives of the criminal justice system, and the application of these criteria to existing programs. Focus is on programs leading to the arrest of Part I offenders: homicide, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, grand larceny, and auto theft. "Probability of arrest" was adopted as the measure of program effectiveness. For Part I crimes, it was found that probability of arrest is high for crimes of passion — homicide, rape, assault — and that probability increases with effort devoted to each case. For crimes of profit, probability of arrest is extremely low and does not appear to increase with effort. General patrol appears to be more productive than tails or stakeouts, and plainclothes detective patrol proved more productive in arresting serious offenders than uniformed patrol and investigation activities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.