Explores the statistical properties of a class of estimators, known as either ridge analysis or ridge regression, proposed as an alternative to ordinary least squares (OLS) regression in analyzing sample data that are collinear. Using Monte Carlo techniques, various ridge estimation procedures were evaluated. All the ridge estimators did worse than OLS for at least some choices of the true regression coefficient in the models considered. Further, the failures were numerous. It thus appears that the ridge estimators proposed to date are not a viable alternative to OLS. However, the results show that it might be possible to define a ridge estimator that would be better than OLS. Until the properties of such an estimator are rigorously derived, the authors caution against using ridge analysis to estimate regression coefficients.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.