Cover: An Evaluation of Ridge Estimators

An Evaluation of Ridge Estimators

Published 1971

by Joseph P. Newhouse, S. D. Oman

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback36 pages $20.00

Explores the statistical properties of a class of estimators, known as either ridge analysis or ridge regression, proposed as an alternative to ordinary least squares (OLS) regression in analyzing sample data that are collinear. Using Monte Carlo techniques, various ridge estimation procedures were evaluated. All the ridge estimators did worse than OLS for at least some choices of the true regression coefficient in the models considered. Further, the failures were numerous. It thus appears that the ridge estimators proposed to date are not a viable alternative to OLS. However, the results show that it might be possible to define a ridge estimator that would be better than OLS. Until the properties of such an estimator are rigorously derived, the authors caution against using ridge analysis to estimate regression coefficients.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.