Cover: Land Reform and the Revolutionary War

Land Reform and the Revolutionary War

A Review of Mao's Concepts and Doctrines

Published 1971

by K. C. Yeh

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback140 pages $30.00

Discussion of the economic basis of the Communist doctrine of land reform and the conditions that led to it. A revolution, as Mao sees it, is a protracted armed struggle, led by the Party and supported by the masses. An essential ingredient in Mao's mobilization program was the positive appeal that touched directly upon the peasants' interests. In the pre-1937 and post-1945 periods, land reform was used to fulfill the need for economic security. During the Sino-Japanese war, when the radical land reform policy was temporarily suspended, a campaign to reduce rent was instituted to redistribute income in favor of the peasants. The Communist leaders spared no effort in indoctrinating and organizing the peasants at the base levels. The catalytic role of the Party was all important: Although poverty and social blockage created the permanent gap between the peasants' aspirations and reality, land reform and other motivational appeals provided a way to bridge that gap. (See also RM-6077.)

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.