Cover: New York City's Mitchell-Lama Program

New York City's Mitchell-Lama Program

Middle-Income Housing?

Published 1971

by Barbara M. Woodfill


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback109 pages $25.00

An analysis of the Mitchell-Lama housing program to help the City of New York evaluate and improve its middle-income housing. Due partly to rising construction and operating costs, the program has been deflected from its intended course. The study finds that almost half the project tenants have high incomes, and most do not have children. Four recommendations are developed to help reorient Mitchell-Lama toward middle-income families with children: (1) Revise the formula governing admission income limits. (2) Provide a higher proportion of two- and three-bedroom units in new projects. (3) Temporarily relax the space occupancy standards to make more units available for larger families in existing projects. (4) Implement the spot-check procedure, which has supplanted the compulsory review of income tax forms, in the annual verification of tenants' incomes.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.