Protest by the Poor

The Welfare Rights Movement in New York City

by Larry R. Jackson, William Arthur Johnson

Download

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 8.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback377 pages $55.00 $44.00 20% Web Discount

Analysis of the origins, growth, and tactics of protest groups involved with welfare in New York City. Welfare rights activities were the product of three developments during the 1960s: the civil rights movement, the War on Poverty, and the evolution of social welfare thought. In New York City, the welfare rights movement received initial impetus from Mobilization for Youth. However, it soon developed grass roots support in the ghetto communities, particularly in Brooklyn and on the lower east side. By 1968 the movement was able to organize mass demonstrations and to extract from the welfare system substantial benefits for its members. The study examines the recent increase in New York City's AFDC rolls and the role that these welfare groups have played and considers other factors, such as rising grant levels and liberalized acceptances thought to have influenced the City's caseload.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.