Cover: Private Police in the United States

Private Police in the United States

Findings and Recommendations

Published 1971

by James S. Kakalik, Sorrel Wildhorn


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 6.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback128 pages $30.00

A summary of the results of a comprehensive, 16-month study of private police in the United States conducted for the U.S. Department of Justice. It draws on information contained in companion reports R-870, R-871, R-872, and R-873, to develop overall findings and study recommendations. It describes the structure, functioning, and problems of various types of private security forces, as well as trends in resource allocation to public and private security. On the basis of evidence from several sources, it is clear that a variety of potential and actual problems do exist. The policy-relevant aspects of the study include the development and evaluation of alternative policy and statutory guidelines for improving private security, with particular regard to roles, operations, conduct, licensing and regulatory standards, and legal authority and constraints.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.