Cover: Troop Movements in Soviet Tactical Doctrine

Troop Movements in Soviet Tactical Doctrine

Published 1971

by Oleg Hoeffding

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

An annotated translation of a chapter from a Soviet textbook on tactics published in 1966. The chapter covers the doctrine of Soviet troop movements under their own power, by rail or water, and by air. Major points include the following: (1) The Soviets have a casual and noncommittal approach to movement of troops by air. (This aspect of doctrine is probably obsolete by now with Soviet acquisition of a major troop airlift capability.) (2) There is an unqualified expectation that troop movements in the European theater will proceed under conditions of tactical nuclear warfare, and confidence that orderly movements will be feasible under such conditions. (3) Soviet doctrine expects enemy efforts toward mobility interdiction by air. (4) Soviet troops moving under their own power appear to be capable of laying and using rough "column tracks" to overcome demolition of regular roads or to increase the capacity of inadequate road networks in offensive operations.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.