Cover: An Experiment in Probabilistic Forecasting

An Experiment in Probabilistic Forecasting

Published 1973

by Thomas A. Brown

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Describes an experiment in forecasting economic, political, and military events, expressing uncertainty with explicit probabilities. The subjects were 31 UCLA summer students: 16 graduate students, 14 upper classmen, and one freshman, of both sexes, ages ranging from 18 to 41, with a wide variety of majors. The questions, asked in July 1970, called for forecasts of December 1970 quantities. Almost all the respondents were able to answer in probabilistic terms. Results were scored when the factual outcomes were known. It was found that, as in other experiments, the true answers tended to appear in the tails of the distribution. Several consensus averaging techniques were used to overcome this problem; the most effective was the probability density technique. Four subjects, out of 31, were able to outscore the consensus: two male seniors, majoring in history and economics, and two female graduate students majoring in counselor education and opera.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.