Cover: The Respending Effects of Untying Aid

The Respending Effects of Untying Aid

Published 1972

by David S. C. Chu, Robert Shishko

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback90 pages $25.00

Analyzes the effect on the U.S. balance of payments of the long-run changes in world trade that would result from "untying" U.S. development loans. In the short run, no longer requiring aid recipients to purchase U.S. products causes a loss of U.S. exports in favor of other nations. As their incomes rise, they import more from the United States. As U.S. export income declines, so will U.S. imports, further improving the payments balance. Unlike earlier models used to estimate this respending effect, the authors' multisector multiplier model links changes in exports to changes in income and thus to changes in imports, with results which fall at the low end of the range established by previous estimates. Under likely variations of basic behavioral assumptions, the multisector multiplier model predicts that the United States would recover 8 to 19 percent of its initial loss from untying. In the most optimistic case, the United States might regain one-third of its first-round loss. (See also R-973, R-974.)

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.