Describes the intergovernmental communication behavior of top public officials in the three-state region based on analysis of 648 responses to a questionnaire mailed to 1200 public officials and 50 personal interviews. While there appears to be no single, integrated intergovernmental communication network, there are three dominant, overlapping, subregional mechanisms: informal peer networks, formal governmental meetings and notification, and professional and governmental organizations. Most communication is between functional counterparts within county or state boundaries and concerns aid programs and specific operational problems with technical solutions rather than the pressing social issues of the day. This description will provide the base case for evaluating the impact of the Metropolitan Regional Council's intergovernmental telecommunication system to begin operation in the fall of 1972.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.