Intergovernmental Communication in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut Metropolitan Region

by Daniel J. Alesch


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 7.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback153 pages $30.00 $24.00 20% Web Discount

Describes the intergovernmental communication behavior of top public officials in the three-state region based on analysis of 648 responses to a questionnaire mailed to 1200 public officials and 50 personal interviews. While there appears to be no single, integrated intergovernmental communication network, there are three dominant, overlapping, subregional mechanisms: informal peer networks, formal governmental meetings and notification, and professional and governmental organizations. Most communication is between functional counterparts within county or state boundaries and concerns aid programs and specific operational problems with technical solutions rather than the pressing social issues of the day. This description will provide the base case for evaluating the impact of the Metropolitan Regional Council's intergovernmental telecommunication system to begin operation in the fall of 1972.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.