Modeling Soviet Behavior and Deterrence
A Procedure for Evaluating Military Forces
ResearchPublished 1974
A Procedure for Evaluating Military Forces
ResearchPublished 1974
Deterrence of Soviet decisions to initiate a military aggression or escalate a prior commitment implies an ability to influence Soviet decision processes. A simple formulation of these processes has them reacting to a perceived situation and an option for military action in that situation in a way that inclines or disinclines them to accept the option. If the reaction is "inclined," they then calculate the likely outcome of the military action using optimistic planning factors and evaluating the results optimistically. If the initial reaction is "disinclined," they are conservative. The factors that control their initial reaction to such situations are of necessity assumptions based on their reactions to similar situations in the past. Four different sets of assumptions explaining their past actions are developed from a wide variety of scholarly sources. These reflect, alternatively, an assumed dominance of bureaucratic leadership, economic aspirations, ideology, and institutional norms. All four are used in this evaluation of deterrence.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.