Analyzes Chinese politics in terms of competition among elite interest groups, or factions of the leadership. Power shifts are deduced from personnel shifts in governing positions. Individuals holding the 1400 most powerful positions in China (400 military, 1000 civil) during four specific periods were compared by field army affiliation, geographic region, Korean War participation, service branch/Ministry, function, and Party generation. (Detailed breakdowns by George Sung are appended.) More than 90 percent joined the Party before 1941. The pre-1928 elders predominate in civil posts, and the second generation (June 1928-November 1931 entry) in military slots. Changes from late 1971 to October 1972 accentuated this generational difference: Predominantly older generals and younger Party secretaries disappeared. Despite analysts' theories of civil/military conflict, 40 percent of top civilian jobs were held by military men in 1971, slightly fewer in 1972. Regionalism gained strength, while field army factions lost. The outcome of China's authority crisis remains in doubt. 496 pp. Ref.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.