Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 6.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback298 pages $60.00 $48.00 20% Web Discount

An analysis of current welfare housing policies in New York City, their costs, results, and weaknesses, and some alternatives that should be considered to improve the quality of housing while keeping the rent allowance costs of the Department of Social Services at a reasonable level. For recurring grants to cover clients' monthly rents, the report proposes two policy alternatives. Rent standards are developed for these policies based on a space standard for each household size and actual costs of well-maintained housing. Costs and impacts of these options over time are traced and their success in meeting housing policy goals is evaluated. The report also assesses the benefits of transition policies, and borough-specific vs. citywide standards. Finally, it proposes a complete restructuring of the conditions and form of issuance of housing-related special payments to eliminate the inequities and perverse incentives of current procedures.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.