Arms Transfers to Latin America
Toward a Policy of Mutual Respect
ResearchPublished 1973
Toward a Policy of Mutual Respect
ResearchPublished 1973
A documentary of recent changes in arms-transfer patterns to Latin America, this report explores the political, economic, and military forces of international supply and demand bearing on U.S. competitiveness, the relationship between arms transfers and U.S. interests, and the Latin American demand for increased modernity of weapons. Heretofore, U.S. policy toward arms transfer has been restrictive, causing Latin American resentment at U.S. paternalism and indifference. European nations are now willing and able to provide Latin America with suitable high-performance equipment for external/internal defense. U.S. policy of arms transfers to Latin America might better be based on the principle of unrestricted but also unsubsidized military sales. Such a policy would eliminate grant material aid, terminate legislative and other restrictions aimed specifically at Latin America, and provide sufficient government credit through the Foreign Military Sales system to increase the competitiveness of U.S. equipment in the market.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.