Preliminary Investigation of Real-World Problem Solving with and without Computers

Volume II: Complete Results

Harold Sackman

ResearchPublished 1973

Part of an NSF research project on "Studies in the Psychology of Man-Computer Problem Solving," this pilot investigation compared problem solving with and without computers, investigated real-world problem solving, and tested the effectiveness of a proposed nine-stage model of real-world problem solving stemming from systems and planning theory. The pilot subjects were 8 RAND professionals and 11 UCLA graduate students, contributing a total of 37 problems. Each subject served as his own control by reporting a computer and a non-computer problem essential for his job or position. Data from a self-administered questionnaire were subjected to extensive statistical analyses. Computer-aided and non-computer problem solving were shown to have fundamentally similar stages and dynamics, and a provisional push-pull theory of insight was suggested. Computer assistance was virtually nonexistent in early problem-finding and problem-planning stages, and appeared most frequently in later solution-testing stages. Overdependence on available software led to procrustean problem solving and inhibition of creativity. Application of computers to real-world problems apparently leads to more favorable attitudes toward computers. Pilot response to the nine-stage model of problem solving was favorable.

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Sackman, Harold, Preliminary Investigation of Real-World Problem Solving with and without Computers: Volume II: Complete Results. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1973. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R1205z1.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.