New York City Fire Alarm Prediction Models

I. Box-Reported Serious Fires

by Grace M. Carter, John E. Rolph

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback87 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Four models for estimating the probability that a box-reported alarm signals a serious fire are given and compared: (1) One-Stage Box History; (2) One-Stage Empirical Bayes; (3) Two-Stage Empirical Bayes Binomial; (4) Two-Stage Empirical Bayes Constant Over Region. Estimates were calculated from data of all alarm boxes in the Bronx prior to and including 1969, and then evaluated by comparison with 1970 data. Estimates were first compared by using a standard statistical test. In addition, estimates were evaluated by comparing the results of dispatching policies based on each of the estimates. Using both the statistical test and the comparison of dispatch policies, it was found that (1) empirical Bayes estimates perform better than estimates based only on the history of the box signaling the alarm, and (2) two-stage estimates are superior to one-stage estimates. That is, in predicting the probability of a serious fire, it is better to first predict the probability of a fire in an occupied structure and then predict the probability that the occupied structural fire is serious, rather than attempt to predict the probability of a serious fire directly.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.