Scenario Designs

An Overview

Peter DeLeon

ResearchPublished 1973

An important element of most models, simulations, or games is the "scenario," which delineates the modeler's conception of whatever he is attempting to represent. This report focuses upon the designing of scenarios for the political/military free-form games, but the underlying assumptions regarding the function of scenarios will be shown to apply to a wide range of modeling exercises. This report considers such issues as the model's frame of reference, bounding the model, the role of theory, and data considerations. The credibility of the model and its "sensitivity testing" are also addressed. Although most of the examples are drawn from the author's experiences in writing scenarios for political/military free-form gaming, the report concludes by demonstrating how these issues are applicable to other forms of modeling such as John Crecine, [Governmental] [Problem-Solving] and Jay Forrester, [Urban Dynamics].

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

DeLeon, Peter, Scenario Designs: An Overview. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1973. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R1218.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.