The Response of State Highway Expenditures and Revenues to Federal Grants-in-Aid.
ResearchPublished 1974
ResearchPublished 1974
Recent legislation has altered the requirement that Federal aid for state highways be limited to capital improvements and be supported by matching funds from the state's own revenues. Using an economic model of decisionmaking, this study examines the expenditure and revenue responses to be expected under a system of federal nonmatching grants. Structural equations are developed for state highway expenditures and revenues, and then specified in a form suitable for regression analysis. The regression results are used to infer the impact of nonmatching grants, and these results are then compared with direct estimates of the impact of matching grants on state highway construction expenditures. Finally, the reduced form equations for capital and current highway spending are used to predict the FY 1972 total spending patterns for individual states under two different grant systems: (1) the present matching grant system and (2) the combined system of matching grants for interstate construction and nonmatching grants for other transportation spending. 75 pp. Ref.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.