Estimating Bomber Penetration and Weapons Effectiveness
ResearchPublished 1974
ResearchPublished 1974
Unclassified abridged version of R-1278, presenting methods for examining the effects of bomber operations against air defenses under a variety of conditions, including the effects of various penetration aids. Based on closed form equations, the expected value models are designed for rapid estimation of outcomes. Bomber survival probability in a single battle is calculated separately for cases in which the interceptors are centrally controlled and cases where they search independently for penetrators. Both models include the effects of various bomber defense missiles, (BDMs) and explicitly treat the effects of long-range BDMs launched before the defense detects the penetrating force. A further extension (which could also be used with other models) examines the configuration of bomber payload to maximize weapons arriving at target. The expected value approach is extended to handle unexpected outcomes. Explicit account is taken of uncertainties throughout. JOSS programs are appended, including routines for decoy discrimination and for AWACS survival.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.