Cover: The Radiation and Heat Budget of the Mintz-Arakawa Model: January.

The Radiation and Heat Budget of the Mintz-Arakawa Model: January.

Published 1973

by Anne B. Kahle, F. Haurwitz

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback71 pages $25.00

Comparison of the radiation and heat budgets of the RAND general circulation model for a January simulation with observational and theoretical values. In the model too much solar radiation is absorbed at the earth's surface due primarily to insufficient atmospheric absorption and reflection. In the tropical latitudes the long-wave flux divergences over the atmospheric column appear to be too large. In the mid-latitudes of both hemispheres these values are in better agreement, while at higher latitudes they again diverge from comparable values. Since the solar flux reaching the surface and the long-wave fluxes are dependent on cloudiness, moisture, and temperature, it is not evident that the fault lies necessarily in the radiative portions of the model. While the heat budget calculations seem reasonable compared to other investigations, our components are generally the largest. This is probably related to the fact that the model possesses a vigorous general circulation. 71 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.