Cover: A General Economic Framework for Welfare Reform Analysis.

A General Economic Framework for Welfare Reform Analysis.

by Dennis N. De Tray

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback68 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Outlines a relatively new economic framework in which the effects of proposed welfare reforms could be analyzed. The argument is made that although the specifics of alternative welfare reform proposals differ considerably, evaluation of almost all proposals requires a common set of basic information about family behavior. The household production model is an analytical framework within which one can begin the task of estimating the behavioral parameters necessary for the evaluation of proposed welfare reforms. The basic structure of the model is presented in a theoretical analysis of factors that affect the amount of time husbands allocate to market work. A second example based on the determinants of desired family size is also given. The report concludes with a set of suggestions for methodologies and research that would improve the future analysis of welfare reform. 68 pp. Bibliog.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.