The New Economic Togetherness
American And Soviet Reactions
ResearchPublished 1973
American And Soviet Reactions
ResearchPublished 1973
Describes and comments on changes in U.S. attitudes toward the Soviet Union in the early 1970s. A few years ago, the dominant belief was that trade with the Soviets was not just trade, but a bad thing; now the prevailing supposition is that such trade is not just trade, it's a good thing. By selecting and juxtaposing statements from public figures (with some ironic footnotes), the author illuminates the process of rising hopes and expansiveness on our part, contrasting "Our Hopes" with "Their Calculations." The higher the level of East/West exchanges and contact, the lower the chance of conflict, it is believed, and the greater the likelihood of influencing Soviet policy and practice. The Politburo has indeed changed its style from rudeness and blatant threats, and has transmuted the Soviet image from one of menacing loners to one of omnipresent and reasonably well-behaved joiners. Americans tend to underestimate the degree to which the new Soviet conduct reflects learning how to handle us, rather than a basic change in objectives.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.