Cover: PROBE I

PROBE I

A Differential Equation Model for Comparing Fighter Escort and Airbase Attack Systems in a Counter-Air Operation

Published 1974

by Freeman A. Tatum, Louis N. Rowell

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback130 pages $30.00

PROBE I models an attack air force vs. an interceptor defense in a conflict extending over as many as thirty missions. For any mission, the attack sorties may be allocated to any combination of (1) aircraft with bombs only, assigned to prime targets, (2) similar aircraft targeting hostile interceptor bases, or (3) aircraft with only air-combat weapons that defend the bombers. The model shows the results of one or a series of missions in which the experimenter specifies the allocations; alternatively, it can determine, mission-by-mission, the allocations that (with the total number of missions specified) will maximize a given objective, such as "total bomb tonnage reaching prime targets." The heart of the model is a set of differential equations that represent the rates at which aircraft change from one state to another, e.g., loaded to unloaded--engaged to disengaged, etc. PROBE I is programmed for the IBM 370/158. 130 pp.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.