Residential Water Heating

Fuel Conservation, Economics, and Public Policy

by James J. Mutch

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback89 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Investigates the changes that can be made in water heating technology to reduce the energy required to heat a given amount of water to some acceptable temperature, i.e., to reduce heat losses from the system. Each measure is examined in an economic cost-benefit framework in which costs are the incremental dollars that must be invested by the consumer to institute the measure, and benefits are the dollars saved in operating (fuel) expenses over the lifetime of the water heater. Government policies are suggested which would encourage implementation of these measures. The study concludes that thicker tank insulation is perhaps the most effective means of reducing heat losses and overall energy consumption of conventional water heaters. Policies that encourage consumers to install economically optimum equipment may result in end use water heating energy reductions of 26 to 68 percent.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.