Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys: The Case of the Department of Defense Post-Service Survey.
ResearchPublished 1974
The bias caused by nonresponse to mailed questionnaires is difficult, and sometimes impossible, to remove. This paper examines several approaches to identifying and correcting survey data thus biased; it concludes that neither the direction nor the magnitude of the bias can be known with confidence unless either (1) the investigator already has considerable information about the sample population; or (2) it is possible to track down and interview an adequate sample of those who did not respond. Of these two conditions, the first is rare and the second, expensive. The paper uses questionnaire data collected from former servicemen (of whom a great deal of information was already available from service records) to demonstrate the alternative procedures for identifying and removing nonresponse bias purely by statistical methods. 35 pp. Bibliog.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1974
- Pages: 35
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: R-1501-ARPA
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.