Evaluation of Intergovernmental Communication: Statistical Baseline Analysis.
ResearchPublished 1974
A follow-on statistical analysis of the reliability and validity of a questionnaire on intergovernmental communication originally administered to 648 respondents in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut metropolitan region. Phase I of this study was concerned with the development, administration, and preliminary interpretation of a survey questionnaire prepared for the Metropolitan Regional Council. The present Phase II effort is a quantitative appraisal of the method and findings of the survey instrument as a baseline for the final Phase III evaluation studies. These studies are concerned with the effectiveness of the prototype two-way TV system for teleconferencing in the tri-state metropolitan region. Measures of item reliability and exploratory hypothesis testing via factor analyses demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity of this instrument for baseline intergovernmental communication patterns. 105 pp. Ref.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1974
- Pages: 105
- Document Number: R-1545-MRC
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.