Firehouse Site Evaluation Model

Description and User's Manual

by Peter Dormont, J. Hausner, Warren Walker


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback198 pages $15.00 $12.00 20% Web Discount

A manual to provide fire department planners, systems analysts and data processing personnel with documentation of a computer-based model that can be used to evaluate alternative arrangements of fire companies. The model provides a way to estimate the fire protection levels, measured in terms of travel times, travel distances and company workloads, that would result from implementation of any given configuration of companies. By comparing the fire protection levels resulting from one arrangement to those resulting from others, objective decisions can be made about the deployment of a city's fire companies. Information is provided about how and when to use the model, the model's assumptions, and its input/output requirements. An illustration of the use of the model in Trenton, New Jersey is included. There is also information for the data processing personnel who will be installing and maintaining the model.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.