Cover: Synoptic Performance Characteristics of the Two-Level Atmospheric Model.

Synoptic Performance Characteristics of the Two-Level Atmospheric Model.

Published 1975

by C. Schutz

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback29 pages $20.00

This analysis of the two-level atmospheric model compares daily changes during January from three experiments and five years of observed data for surface air temperatures at Columbia, Missouri, and five basic characteristics in the vicinity of the Icelandic and Aleutian Lows. Strong diurnal changes were found in all simulated temperatures, but low and high diurnal ranges that would accompany specific synoptic events in nature are not well portrayed. The positions of the lows tested based on the lowest daily pressures were clumped, and in the North Atlantic were located southwest of the climatological center. Mean January pressures from these centers showed that the simulated Icelandic Low is 4.3 mb less intense, while the Aleutian Low is 1.9 mb more intense than observed. When all analyzed low pressure centers were combined, simulated speeds were slower and durations longer than observed. Finally, the simulated tracks were shown to be farther north. 29 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.